Legal privilege is not an optional clause
Your exhibits, clients and strategies train no public model. We use European hosting, encryption and matter-level isolation. What leaves the firm is agreed in writing before any code, in line with the GDPR.
An assistant that prepares, a lawyer who decides.
Case-law research, contract review and first drafts of submissions eat billable hours. We build an assistant that does the heavy lifting, while your files stay under your control.
What you get
- Document review: flag sensitive clauses, dates and obligations across a large file
- Assisted search through your case law and exhibits, with a link back to the source
- First drafts of submissions, letters and summaries, ready to review and approve
- A full matter condensed into a structured note, not a vague summary
The assistant proposes, the lawyer rules
No submission, clause or opinion goes out without human review. The assistant writes a draft that links to the exhibit or judgment it cites. You check each statement instead of rewriting from scratch.
Where the time saved is real
Reading a file of several hundred pages, finding a clause across fifty contracts, comparing two versions of an agreement, building a chronology of facts. These checkable tasks give hours back without touching legal judgement.
Built for a firm, not for a demo
We start from how your firm works: matter naming, submission templates, your current document management system. The tool plugs into them. If an idea cannot survive privilege or professional ethics, we say so before building.
We scope it in 20 minutes.
One call is enough to know whether the topic deserves a real project.
Scope a legal assistant