AI & legal practice

An assistant that prepares, a lawyer who decides.

Case-law research, contract review and the first draft of submissions eat up billable hours that are poorly spent. We build an assistant that does the heavy lifting on those tasks, without ever taking your files out of your control.

What you get

  • Document review: flag sensitive clauses, dates and obligations across a large file
  • Assisted search through your case law and exhibits, with a link back to the source
  • First drafts of submissions, letters and summaries, ready to review and approve
  • A full matter condensed into a structured note, not a vague summary

Legal privilege is not an optional clause

Your exhibits, clients and strategies train no public model. We work with European hosting, encryption and matter-level isolation. What leaves the firm is defined in writing before a single line of code, in line with the GDPR.

The assistant proposes, the lawyer rules

No submission, no clause and no opinion goes out without human review. The assistant produces a verifiable draft, linked back to the exhibit or the judgment it cites, so you check each statement instead of rewriting from scratch. Responsibility stays where it belongs.

Where the time saved is real

Working through a file of several hundred pages, finding a clause across fifty contracts, comparing two versions of an agreement, building a chronology of the facts. These are precise, checkable tasks where the assistant gives hours back without touching legal judgement.

Built for a firm, not for a demo

We start from how your firm actually works: matter naming, submission templates, the document management system you already use. The tool plugs into it rather than forcing a new piece of software to learn. And if an idea cannot survive privilege or professional ethics, we say so before building it.

We scope it in 20 minutes.

One call is enough to know whether the topic deserves a real project.

Scope a legal assistant